Friday 7 February 2014

Luka Modric's value at Real Madrid finally appreciated

Some called it the Battle of the Bernabeu; others appealed for somebody to please think of the children.

At times during Wednesday night's Copa del Rey semi-final first leg between Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid, there was something cartoonish about the violence. The game's lasting image might just be that screenshot of Pepe's snot heading out of his nose and towards Diego Costa's face, while two of Real Madrid's three goals came via fortunate deflections. Studs were shown and bodies thrown. When Alec Baldwin turned up on the club's TV channel afterwards, he was just another actor at the Bernabéu.

But it wasn't all bad, and not just because the atmosphere and intensity made this compelling viewing.

Somewhere in the middle of the diving and the pushing and the kicking and the gouging, Luka Modric played football.

While all around him people lost their heads, he kept his. He also kept the ball. No one on the pitch completed more passes than he did and when he was finally withdrawn with ten minutes to go, the Santiago Bernabeu chanted his name. It is not a stadium especially given to chanting players' names, but this was not the first time.
AP Photo/Paul White)Luka Modric is finally living up to his massive transfer from Tottenham at Real Madrid under Carlo Ancelotti.
The cliche says that in games like this -- nasty, brutish and short -- talented players hide and little guys go missing. Some cliches are true; this one is not. Wednesday night was another demonstration. Down under the main stand, a silver crucifix hanging from his neck, Modric described this as the "perfect game." Far from passing him by, the game passed by him. Every time he got hit, and he got hit often, he got on. When he evaded challenges, it was not fear but efficiency. Every time a team-mate had it, he wanted it; every time he had it, he gave it. Every time he seemed to be cornered, he found a way out.

Modric has become central to Real Madrid's ambitions, and "central" is the word; only Pepe, Ronaldo, Ramos and Benzema have played more minutes, his involvement within games is constant, always close to the ball, often in contact with it, and there's a confidence about him now that is contagious. His team-mates seek him out, the trust in him has grown and there's a kind of swagger in his play, carrying the ball forward, linking midfield and attack.

"Modric's ability resides in that fantastic capacity he has to advance with the ball," Carlo Ancelotti says.

Meanwhile, only six players in the league have completed more passes than him, a list perhaps surprisingly led by Rayo Vallecano's Roberto Trashorras, and he has five assists in the league.

But it is more than that. If no Madrid player has a better pass completion ratio, it is also true that no midfielder has won back possession more than him. He has committed only a handful of fouls fewer than Sergio Ramos. So much for that being the role of the big, powerful athlete, dedicated only to destruction. On Wednesday night, Real Madrid's success was built on intensity and then intelligence; Modric was at the heart of that. Compete first, create from there. He even cleared Diego Godin's header off the line at 2-0, an intervention that could prove decisive in Real Madrid reaching the final.

Luka Modric was signed at the very end of the transfer window in 2012. He cost over thirty million euros and the move cost him: he later said that not having a full pre-season with Madrid had made his adaptation harder. "The first year at a new club and a new type of football is not so easy for any player," Ancelotti says.

In February of last year, Modric admitted that he was not completely satisfied with his performances since joining. Two months before, a poll on Marca's website -- a readers' poll, note, not the newspaper itself -- named him the worst signing of 2012, the "fiasco," with 32.2 percent of the vote. Some critics too considered him a failure. Some thought he was, bluntly, just not that good.

In part, it was tempting to see that judgment as having its roots in a basic misunderstanding -- one that began with a failure to grasp what Modric really was. Many in Spain, possibly even most, saw him as a media-punta, the creative midfielder playing just behind the striker(s), even though he played deeper at Spurs. When it was put to them that Modric was a player who should play further back, as involved at the start of moves as at the end, the idea was usually rejected. Most doubted that he had the ability to control the game. It might not have helped either that he was not Spanish.

Even that superb performance at Old Trafford did not entirely change things. Modric started seventeen of the last nineteen league games last season (compared to eight of the nineteen before then), Jose Mourinho increasingly impressed by him, but doubts remained; his position shifted occasionally there appeared to be a reluctance in much of the media to appreciate his contribution. Some held to the idea that he could not be a central midfielder.

In the summer Asier Illaramendi and Isco were signed, a new generation. Two players who could and probably occupy his position(s) but Ancelotti announced: "Modric will not be sold." Few would have rebelled had he been, including many at boardroom level.
Gonzalo Arroyo Moreno/Getty ImagesDespite his lack of athleticism, Luka Modric has proven himself to be solid at defense along with his playmaking ability.
Last season Modric tended to be either one of two central midfielders at the base of a triangle or the more creative midfielder at the front of one. Now, that triangle is the other way round and a little further back, with Alonso slightly deeper, Modric slightly to the right and Di Maria slightly to the left (with a tendency to drift wider than Modric). Modric's position, his role, is what gets called a volante: similar to that of Xavi Hernandez at Barcelona. Modric, though, is more mobile. To use the Spanish term, he is more vertical.

Real Madrid's formation has evolved and shifted until it fit Modric perfectly, not least because his performances have warranted that. Now the formation appears stable. Once Xabi Alonso had returned from injury early in the season, the midfield three was, from right to left: Khedira-Alonso-Modric. Sami Khedira's injury brought a shift to 4-2-3-1 that meant that Modric's natural position did not really exist. Now it is back to 4-3-3 again, but there is a different, more controlled, more creative feel to it now.

As Madrid's assistant coach Paul Clement explained: "When Alonso came back fit we played with Alonso, Khedira and Modric and we think we found a nice blend of experience and qualities for those different positions. But Khedira got injured. What were we going to do? We had a real long discussion Carlo, Zidane and myself about it. Is the best thing now to slot a player into that position because the team have found some nice continuity now in that shape? Or do we change the formation again based on the players available? And we decided to change the formation to go with two central midfielders and to play Isco behind the striker."

The shift, in short, was away from Modric and towards Isco? "Possibly," Clement replied, "but Luka is such a good player I think he could play in that Isco position too. I think he can play next to Alonso or next to Illaramendi in a two or he can play on the side of a three. I don't think his position is the pivot [the sole deep-lying midfielder] because he has got a lot of attacking creative quality."

Then Clement added: "So far it is working quite well but who is to say we wont change back again?"

That was in December and Madrid have indeed shifted back again. Back towards Modric back towards a system which Ancelotti believes suits Modric perfectly because it allows him to move forward with the ball but also come back to receive and play, drawing closer or further away from Xabi Alonso as position, pace and the game dictates. Against Atlético Madrid, neither Illaramendi nor Isco played. Modric did and it was a familiar line-up.

All season, Ancelotti has talked about the importance of balance. With Luka Modric, he has found it. This system benefits Modric. And that benefits Real Madrid. 

50-50 Challenge: Liverpool vs. Arsenal

In the latest installment of our 50-50 Challenge series, club experts David Usher and Andrew Mangan face off ahead of Saturday's big Premier League clash when Liverpool host Arsenal at Anfield.

David is one of ESPN's resident Liverpool experts and is the founder and editor of the popular Liverpool fanzine and website The Liverpool Way. He has written two books on the Reds, The King's Last Stand -- The Final March with Kenny's Army and Like I Say ... The Story of the 2012-13 Season. You can follow him on Twitter @theliverpoolway.

Andrew Mangan is one of ESPN's Arsenal experts. He's the owner and writer of the award winning arseblog.com and has blogged about Arsenal every day since 2002. He likes late winners, clean sheets, bullet headers and John Terry falling over. You can follow him on Twitter @arseblog.

Both writers will address the same topics, so here we go:

LIVERPOOL-ARSENAL MEMORIES
DU: I've got plenty, but very few of them good. The worst is fairly obvious; I was a 15-year-old kid left heartbroken when Michael Thomas ran through our exhausted defence to win the title for Arsenal at Anfield in 1989. To make matters worse I was sat just yards away from the travelling Gooners and I can vividly remember leaving the stadium, choking back tears whilst hurling insults at the Arsenal fans on my way out. They were too delirious to even notice, which made me feel even worse.

I despise Charlie George even though I wasn't even a twinkle in my dad's eye when he hit that famous FA Cup Final winner against the Reds in 1971. My grandad never forgave George for that infamous goal celebration and although he passed away when I was very young, his contempt for the long-haired former Gunners' star lives on through me.
Alex Livesey/Getty ImagesAndrei Arshavin destroyed Liverpool's title hopes in 2009. Can the Reds get revenge in 2014?

In recent years there was the 4-4 draw at Anfield in 2009 when Russian flop Andrei Arshavin scored all of Arsenal's goals in a game that more or less ended Liverpool's hopes of catching Manchester United. Another one that stands out is a 2-1 defeat in 2012 that caused a downward spiral in the Reds' form that ultimately cost "King Kenny" his job. Liverpool were chasing a top four spot and absolutely battered Arsenal that day yet somehow lost and after that the wheels came off their season completely. I'm seriously depressing myself here, I need to find my happy place ... Ah, there it is ... the Millennium Stadium, Cardiff, 2001. "1-0 down, 2-1 up, Michael Owen won the cup ..."

Full Coverage:
- Bennett: Who will break first?
- Kelly: Rodgers vs. the old guard
- Cross: Gunners must have faith
- FC TV: Can Arsenal stay top?
- Watch: Tommy Smyth's Top Tips

AM: The obvious one from an Arsenal point of view is Anfield '89; it's hard to top winning the title in such a fashion. Considering their status at that time, it was truly remarkable to go there and score twice, especially so late. But I often think back to the game in the 2003-4 season when Arsenal had been knocked out of the FA Cup by Manchester United and in the Champions League by Chelsea in the same week. Liverpool came to Highbury and led 2-1 at half-time. It might have been the moment Arsenal's season fell apart, but Thierry Henry dug deep in the second half, drove the Gunners to a 4-2 win and we continued the season without losing a game. The character the team showed that day, having been so gutted by the European exit in particular, was phenomenal.

The worst? Probably the 2001 FA Cup final when Liverpool's keeper, Stephane Henchoz (!), made a wonderful save to deny an Arsenal goal and Michael Owen scored twice late on to nick it. Painful to lose a cup final like that.

THE RIVALRY
DU: It's a healthy rivalry without the bad feeling you often get between other big clubs. Obviously Everton and Manchester United are Liverpool's biggest rivals due to geographical reasons, but so many epic clashes with Arsenal over the years and both sides having been competing for the same prizes brings its own kind of rivalry. It's a similar situation with Chelsea, although in general Liverpool fans have a lot of respect for Arsenal as a club whilst having next to none for Chelsea.

AM: I think it's always been relatively respectful. There's no geographical element to raise the stakes, and when we were battling with United throughout the 90s and 2000s, I think there might have been a touch of the "enemy of my enemy" stuff from a Liverpool point of view. When I was growing up, they were the all-conquering Liverpool, the most successful team of the generation, and with that has come a stature that's impossible to shake. Arsenal versus Liverpool is always a big fixture in the calendar.

FEAR FACTOR
DU: Everyone -- Where do I start? The thing with Arsenal is they come at you from all angles, and shutting down one player is not going to make any difference. Theo Walcott being out is a big bonus for a Liverpool defence that can often look vulnerable to pace on the break. Given what Gabriel Agbonlahor did the other week for Aston Villa, I'm delighted that Walcott won't be playing. Nevertheless, Arsenal have so many players who can pop up with a goal that there's no single player I'm especially worried about -- it's more the collective.
John Powell/Liverpool FC/Getty ImagesThe potent pace of Liverpool's front three will surely test the Gunners.
AM: Luis Suarez, obviously -- He's having a fantastic season and since his return has showed exactly why Arsene Wenger tried to buy him in the summer. Somewhat unusually for modern football, they have a strike partnership as he's dovetailed very well with Daniel Sturridge. Their quality means that the Arsenal defence, as good as it's been all season, will need to be at the top of their game tomorrow. I also think Jordan Henderson in midfield has come on leaps and bounds. He reminds me a bit of Aaron Ramsey in the way he plays, albeit without the Welshman's incredible goal-scoring record this season.

X FACTOR
DU: Kolo Toure -- I have a strong feeling Toure is going to have a big say in the outcome of this game, but I'm not sure whether it will be a positive or a negative impact! Being up against his former club and with a point to prove after his howler last week at West Brom, the veteran Ivorian will be desperate to impress but even disregarding his faux pas last weekend, he's looked a little unsteady of late after making a flying start to his Anfield career. I'm concerned about him defensively, but I have a gut feeling he may well pop up on the end of a Gerrard set-piece to claim his first Liverpool goal.

AM: Santi Cazorla -- From an Arsenal point of view, the recent form of Cazorla has been outstanding. The Spaniard hadn't been at his best in the first part of the season but having got over his injury problems, it now looks like he's close to 100 percent again and also that he and Mesut Ozil have found a way to play together effectively. The thought of seeing the two of them together was a mouthwatering one at the start of the season, and now would be a great time for them to really click.

PREDICTIONS
DU: Draw -- The heart says Liverpool to win 3-2, but the head is telling me I should be happy with a draw as Brendan Rodgers has found it very difficult against Arsenal since taking over at Anfield. It's not a good match-up in terms of style for Liverpool -- Arsenal tend to do what Liverpool want to do, only they do it better. Still, Liverpool's front three will cause anyone problems and Anfield has been something of a fortress this season, so it promises to be a great spectacle.

AM: Draw -- Despite Arsenal's defensive stability, it's away from home where they've been most likely to concede. Liverpool's quality up front makes it difficult not to see them make a breakthrough at some point, but Arsenal have goals throughout the side too. A score draw for me.

Do titles turn on big-game battles?

For all Jose Mourinho's continued downplaying of Chelsea's title chances after the win at Manchester City, there was one facet of his team he couldn't resist trumpeting. "We won because we were the best team," he said. "We defended very well -- we were very compact. We deserved it. We love the big games."

There can be little disputing that. Mourinho's teams, beyond the brief period at Real Madrid when he initially struggled to match a brilliant Barcelona, have always had a magnificent record against their main rivals. There is so often a focused aggressiveness about his sides, allowing them to rise to the occasion but also keep their composure -- and the points.

It is no coincidence that Chelsea's best and most convincing performances of this campaign came against Liverpool and Manchester City, and that is also a trait that goes back to when Mourinho first arrived at Stamford Bridge in 2004.

The 1-0 victory at the Etihad on Monday gave the Portuguese a total of 63 points from 31 league games against Champions League-challenging sides in all his time at Chelsea. That's 2.03 points a game, a return his side are close to matching this season. Although they still have an inferior record to City’s against the big teams, that is tempered by the fact that they are the only one of them to take points from Manuel Pellegrini's side -- and they have done so twice.
TeamGamesPointsReturn

Manchester City

8

18

2.25

Chelsea

8

15

1.88

Liverpool

7

10

1.43

Arsenal

6

8

1.33

Everton

7

9

1.29

Tottenham Hotspur

8

6

0.75

Manchester United

8

5

0.63


The deeper issue is whether all this actually means much beyond displaying mettle, and it is an issue that is particularly pertinent for Arsenal. This weekend's trip to Liverpool is the first of nine such big games from the next 12 in all competitions. The period may define their season, but do such games really decide the title race?

The question carries even more weight for Arsene Wenger because, so far, Arsenal have the worst return of the top three in such games and a middling one in all: two wins, two draws, two defeats. Arsenal's best return against the top teams since the 2003-04 "Invincibles" season was 1.83 points per fixture in 2006-07.

None of this is to say that they are as poor against the big teams as is mistakenly perceived -- they have defeated Borussia Dortmund this season in a crunch fixture, for example -- but they don't yet look quite capable of generating the psychological intensity of Chelsea or the exceptional extremes of Manchester City.

Of course, Wenger could reasonably point to their supreme record in every other match and the fact that it so far puts them top of the only ranking that matters: the Premier League table itself.

The question is whether that can last or whether Arsenal must raise themselves to claim a key victory in one of their remaining games against Chelsea and City. Will Pellegrini's side, by contrast, be made to pay for twice falling to Mourinho?

The last two campaigns provide contrasting examples.

Last season, Manchester United were so ruthless against the rest of the field that it didn't matter that City were better against the best. While Sir Alex Ferguson's side claimed 11 points in matches against Chelsea, Arsenal and Tottenham Hotspur -- again, the clubs that actually had a reasonable chance of Champions League qualification -- Roberto Mancini's City side amassed 14. It still wasn't enough to get them anywhere near to closing the immense gap United had created. Ferguson had done enough.

The previous season was wildly different, as emphasised by the exhilarating ending and what the title actually came down to.

City claimed six more points than United against the top teams, with the difference provided by the two derby victories. Of course, with that also leaving them dead level going into the last day of the season, the seven goals Mancini's men hit against United ended up deciding the destination of the trophy on goal difference.

So their games against each other couldn't have mattered more. Naturally, then, the type of title race greatly matters too.

In that, the summer of 2004 set a certain trend. The arrival of Mourinho and Rafa Benitez solidified the first "big four," as Chelsea and Liverpool joined United and Arsenal, while the increase in the Premier League's Champions League places to four emphasised the full importance of the continental competition. From then, qualification became so important precisely because the revenue from it conditioned so much. The greater cash increased the gap between the elite and the rest, meaning more teams were getting higher points hauls.

It is perhaps no surprise that since then, six of the nine title races have been won by the sides with superior big-game records. Even more relevant: In four of those six, the overall gap between the top two was small enough for those crunch fixtures to be of genuine significance.

Many might point to the self-evident reality that a side needs to do sufficiently well in the majority of their games to even put them in that position in the first place, but the point is that modern football economics are making that more and more of a given.
Jose Mourinho got the better of Manuel Pellegrini on Monday.
PA PhotosJose Mourinho got the better of Manuel Pellegrini on Monday.
This season arguably reflects those realities more than many, given that City have racked up historic goal returns but were still out-thought by a Chelsea team employing one of the most successful managers of all time. Arsenal, meanwhile, have so far reaped the rewards of breaking their transfer record when they signed Mesut Ozil from Real Madrid.

As a consequence, it feels as though this race could be sufficiently close for their faceoffs to be significant. The classic example of this comes from Spain, with Pellegrini himself having suffered the most exacting campaign. In the Chilean's one season at Real Madrid in 2009-10 -- the season before Mourinho took over -- Los Blancos beat more of the other 18 sides than Barcelona. The Catalans, however, claimed victory in both Clasicos to stay top.

Pellegrini will hope that history does not repeat itself in this campaign.

Wenger will hope to alter a trend -- either in terms of big games mattering or improving his own results.

Mourinho, finally, will hope to be trumpeting his team again.

Thursday 6 February 2014

The setbacks of sin bins

On March 1, when FIFA’s International Football Association Board -- the body that tweaks and preserves the Laws of the Game -- reconvenes, one of the items on the agenda will be “sin bins” or “penalty boxes.” It’s the idea that, for an infraction lying somewhere in between a yellow and a red, players could be sent off for 10 minutes and then return to the pitch.

Its success in hockey and rugby has, in recent years, seen it become more popular, so much so that it’s one of the few things both Michel Platini and Sepp Blatter seemingly see eye-to-eye on. Both are, at the very least “open to considering the idea.” Indeed, it is currently being trialled at amateur level in Holland.

Proponents of the idea say it’s a necessary “orange card.” They suggest it’s a required intermediate sanction for infractions where a caution seems too lenient and a sending off too harsh.

Furthermore, those who insist that an “early red card” ends up “spoiling the game” (not a view I share, to me there is no such thing: If you deserve to go, you go) might see this as a welcome compromise.

My initial reaction is that good referees -- and we ought to strive toward having the best possible -- do a good job officiating with the tools they already have and that the sin bin would actually come in handy for those officials who don’t have the courage to apply the Laws of the Game and show red when it’s warranted.

Plus, I see no great need for sin bins, and apart from those in the rugby crowd who look down on football people and who are convinced the world would be a better place if only the captain were allowed to speak to the referee, I don't believe I'm alone in this.

Yet beyond that and the mechanics of the game, my concern is for the spectacle. It’s 0-0 with half an hour gone and a team just lost a player for 10 minutes. What do they do?

Easy. They go on lockdown
 
While his two dogs, Ruud and Marco (yes, I know...) romped outside, he told us about a drill he would do to prove a point to his players.

“Five organized players can beat ten disorganized ones,” he said. “To show the benefits of tactical organization I took four defenders -- Mauro Tassotti, Paolo Maldini, Billy Costacurta and Franco Baresi -- plus the goalkeeper, Giovanni Galli and I pitted them against ten other players, including the likes of Marco Van Basten, Pietro Virdis, Ruud Gullit, Roberto Donadoni, Carlo Ancelotti, Frank Rijkaard, Chicco Evani and so on.

“The defenders simply had to clear the ball, the other guys had 15 minutes to score. The only stipulation is that, if they failed to score they would get the ball 10 meters inside their own half. We did this all the time and my defenders never conceded a goal. Never, not once, all season long.”

Since then, enough coaches and players have told me that Sacchi’s little 15 minute 5-on-10 mini-game has been replicated many times and that, yes, most of the time, if the defenders are organized and work as a unit -- even if they don’t include superhumans such as Maldini and Baresi -- the 10 don’t score in the allotted quarter hour.

Now imagine not five players, but nine players going into full lockdown mode against 10 outfield opponents. I see 10 minutes of abject, one-way sterility with either massive hoofs into a crowded penalty area or guys running into knots of opponents, hoping they’ll somehow win a free kick or a penalty.

In the same way that Sacchi’s defenders learned the 15 minute 5-on-10 drill, you can easily imagine clubs going into penalty-kill mode when the sin bin strips them of a player.

They just need to hold out for 10 minutes of one-way traffic and then -- presto! -- the rejuvenated offender sprints back on to the pitch and we’re level again, except for the fact that the team that was a man down has a rested player.

I’m sure there is data out there regarding how much more likely a team is to score when they have a man advantage. And that you can filter and modulate it based on the relative strength of the two sides, the time of the match and whatever else. But, even then, there is a massive difference between knowing you’ll have to play the last hour of a game down a man and knowing you just need to hold out for 10 minutes.

If there is a substantial uptick -- other factors being equal -- in scoring against a short-handed opponent now, I’d suggest it’s because one team know they’ll have 10 men the rest of the game and so they adjust the way they play. If they’re losing, they’ll still figure out a way to attack and take chances while, if they’re winning or drawing, they’ll try to hang on.

I imagine folks saying that if it’s so easy to park the bus and defend in your own half, why doesn't every team that gets a man sent off do it?

On that, I refer you to my previous point. When you know you have 10 men the rest of the game, the temptation to gamble and try to nick something on the counterattack is great. You may only have one or two chances to do so.

However, if you know you’ll be at full strength in a few minutes, you may not gamble that way. And this holds true even if you’re already losing. Get a man sin-binned in the first half and, even though you’re a goal down, your instinct will be to limit the damage and go for it later, at full-strength.

That is what makes me most uneasy about sin bins: that they will change the way the game is played and not for the better. IFAB won’t approve their introduction on March 1; at most they’ll simply approve more testing and experimentation, like the ones in Holland, albeit on a larger scale.

If that happens, all we can hope for is very detailed monitoring, ideally with the aid of analytics, while also realizing that it’s one thing for amateurs to spend 10 minutes with 10 men and quite another for professionals, who are quicker, stronger, fitter, more technical and more tactically astute, to do so.

We see enough teams parking the bus already. Giving more a very specific reason to do so doesn't do much for entertainment. Or, sports, for that matter.

Cricket - Botham slams 'amateur comedians' who sacked KP


Former England all-rounder Sir Ian Botham has expressed his disgust at Kevin Pietersen's axing and called on the "amateur comedians" at the England and Wales Cricket Board to provide answers.

Former England captains Michael Vaughan and Nasser Hussain on Wednesday demanded a detailed explanation, and Botham echoed those sentiments.
In his column in the Daily Mirror, the 58-year-old wrote: "I'm baffled, exasperated and disgusted the England and Wales Cricket Board think they can get rid of Kevin Pietersen, issue a statement full of corporate waffle, and hope everyone will forget about it.
"Well, I've got news for the amateur comedians who run the ECB. We want answers, the truth. We want detailed, precise reasons behind their decision to end Pietersen's international career.
"If you sacked a factory worker on the shop floor without telling him why he's been fired, he would take his employers to the cleaners through the courts.
"The ECB can't just hide behind their blazers and wait for the fuss to die down. They can't leave everyone to speculate why England have ditched one of their finest players."
He continued: "The buffoons at Lord's don't just owe KP an explanation - although you might have thought it was a common courtesy to outline why he has been sent into exile.
"They owe the paying public, the fans who spend £100 on a ticket to home Test matches, a reason why they have discarded the star attraction.
"They owe the punters who spend their life-savings to follow England halfway round the world, only to see them get hammered 5-0, more than a fudged statement."

David Beckham reveals Miami franchise

MIAMI -- David Beckham has exercised his option to purchase a Major League Soccer expansion team in Miami, and the deal will be finalized when the former England captain can secure a financing plan and location for a new stadium.
Jeff Gross/Getty ImagesDavid Beckham made his Miami MLS plans official on Wednes
"I am thrilled to announce that David Beckham has exercised his option to purchase an MLS expansion team and has selected Miami for his club," MLS commissioner Don Garber said Wednesday.
Beckham made the announcement during a news conference in Miami with Garber and Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez.
"Thank you for the warm welcome," Beckham told a crowd of more than 300 people who attended the news conference at a downtown museum plaza on a sunny, 80-degree morning. "This is an exciting time and something we're really looking forward to bringing to Miami."
Beckham has scouted possible stadium sites and is seeking investors to assist with start-up costs such as construction and player acquisitions. Among those who might become involved is Beckham's friend LeBron James, who has had recent conversations with the retired soccer star about bringing a team to Miami.
"We don't want public funding," Beckham said to applause. "We will fund the stadium ourselves. We have worked very hard to get to this stage where we can fund the stadium ourselves. We want to create a football club that is the people's football club."
On Wednesday, Beckham told ESPN he would continue to pursue James' involvement.
"Talks have been ongoing, but we're friends at the end of the day. He's a lover of Miami obviously. He's a lover of the sport, and he's one of the world's greatest sportsman. So to have him involved would be great, but to have him involved as a friend and as a fan… that's more important," Beckham said.
Beckham, looking the part of a businessman in a suit and tie, said the mayor made a commitment to place a stadium downtown. Gimenez -- who at one point referred to Beckham as "Beckman" -- said there is political support for a stadium plan.
The next steps are to sit down with city officials and his business partners, Beckham said.
"People like to walk to football. I've seen what it is like in Seattle," he said. "We can't build a stadium in six months, but once we have a site, once we work with the mayor and the commissioners of Miami, we will be pretty quick."
The stadium plan that has gained the most attention is a bid to lease a parcel of county-owned land in the Port of Miami.
The proposed site is close to the Miami Heat's basketball arena and Miami Beach hotel district, but county commissioners have encouraged MLS to consider other sites away from the busy port.
Beckham's investment group, Miami Beckham United, has begun negotiations with the county over the seaport site, according to the Miami Herald. Miami-Dade officials have said that any deal involving public land would have to clear political hurdles.
The group has said it plans to use private funds to build the stadium, though it has hired a Tallahassee lobbyist to seek a state subsidy other professional sports teams have received.
The mayor said negotiations for a stadium site are ongoing.
"We are willing partners. We are very grateful that David Beckham and MLS have chosen Miami as the site for their franchise," Gimenez said. "We are going to do all in our power to get the stadium built in the right place."
Asked why he chose Miami, Beckham said, "Why not?"
As to whether he had marquee players in mind for Miami, Beckham told reporters it would be presumptuous to assume anything, but admitted to ESPN that he has been "getting phone calls, which is a good thing," and would be making his best effort to lure stars.
"I think that's what is going to bring this team and give this team some success and give this team a global name," he said of the star power. "When you bring great players in, you know the world gets interested, and that's what we need to do. We plan on bringing players through from a young age and bringing local talent. We also plan on bringing great players and players that have also been at the best clubs in the world, so we'll work on that."
He said he looked forward to starting a team from scratch with business partners Simon Fuller as well as Marcelo Claure -- the billionaire owner of Brightstar Corp.
"I want to make it my own team," Beckham said. "I know this city is ready for football, and this is going to be successful."
As part of the MLS contract he signed when he joined the Los Angeles Galaxy, the former Manchester United, Real Madrid and Galaxy star had the right to an expansion team at a discount fee of $25 million. MLS' Miami Fusion played in Fort Lauderdale from 1998 to 2001 before folding because of poor attendance.
"You know it's up to use to make sure that we have full stadiums almost every game," Beckham told ESPN. "It's up to us to create something that people can be proud of, and we're going to do that."
The crowd at the news conference included chanting fans and several dozen photographers who jostled for pictures.
"People here love this sport," Garber said. "We together have no doubt it will be a very successful MLS team."
Garber has recently pushed for rapid MLS expansion, starting with New York City FC in 2015. Miami is the league's 22nd franchise. The league hopes to place its next expansion team in Atlanta.

The curse of continuity?

"I always believe a four-year cycle is probably the most you can achieve. There are very, very few teams who can create more than a four-year cycle." -- Sir Alex Ferguson, October 2010.

Not for the first time in a career of logic-defying longevity and excessive achievement, one of Ferguson’s own sides proved an exception to the rule. By May 2011, his Manchester United had won a fourth league title in five years, a period in which they also reached two three Champions League finals and one other semifinal.

It was Ferguson’s final great team; either the third or the fourth, depending upon interpretation, he built at Old Trafford. It was based around nine players: Cristiano Ronaldo, who was sold in 2009, and an octet who were constants in the glory years between 2006 and 2011: Edwin van der Sar, Rio Ferdinand, Nemanja Vidic, Patrice Evra, Michael Carrick, Paul Scholes, Ryan Giggs and Wayne Rooney.

It is now 2014. Of that group, only Rooney is under 32 yet only the retired Van der Sar and Scholes do not remain from a side that came together in earnest with the 2006 additions of Vidic, Evra and Carrick. The four-year cycle has become an eighth-year puncture. United are belatedly discovering that rebuilding was postponed for too long.

When Anderson was loaned to Fiorentina last month, perhaps the most shocking statistic was that he had only made 70 league starts in six-and-a-half years at Old Trafford. It is a length of service that, at another club, would make someone captain, vice-captain or a senior professional. At United, it brought a perennial status as a fringe figure.
John Peters/Getty ImagesThough he departed as a champion, Ferguson left Moyes with a decaying squad.
Ferguson’s sentimental streak was long camouflaged by a ruthless edge, but in his final years he allowed players to linger when their standards slipped. In a profession notable for job insecurity, the assumption developed that players would remain at Old Trafford forever.

United, football’s foremost advertisement for continuity, whether in the dugout or on the pitch, are discovering there can be too much of a good thing. It is a theme of football discourse that change can backfire, whether it is the knee-jerk decision to sack managers, the making of short-term signings or the drastic overhaul of a squad. But the opposite can apply, too: those who stand still actually threaten to go backwards.

The poster boys -- or, in this instance, the poster pensioners -- for permanence are a case in point. Many have marvelled at the capacity of the Milanello medics to extend careers yet the AC Milan team that enjoyed its final hurrah by winning the 2007 Champions League was allowed to age together.

Although Paolo Maldini finally retired at 41 in 2009, Milan fielded 14 players born in the 1970s during the following season: their sixth successive year without winning Serie A. It was also, broadly speaking, the side Carlo Ancelotti had assembled the best part of a decade earlier. It required a generational shift for Max Allegri to end their wait for a Scudetto the following campaign with a blend of experience and relative youth.

Vast as the differences between the two teams were, something similar happened at Arsenal in the 1990s. George Graham’s side grew stale, lacking invention or new ideas. They became champions after radical, but intelligent change as Arsene Wenger fused his midfield and forward line onto Graham’s goalkeeper and famous back four. It ensured only one department of the team consisted of the aged.

In the days before transfers were as frequent, many a successful side deteriorated together in an indictment of continuity: Stan Cullis’ Wolves, Bill Shankly’s first Liverpool team (before he built a second), Sir Matt Busby’s Manchester United, who stumbled under his successors, and Don Revie’s Leeds.

There is a theory that Revie left for England in 1974 partly because he could not bear to break up his defining team. Instead it was a task he bequeathed to his successors and, although Leeds reached the European Cup final in 1975, their subsequent decline was swift.

The past tends to inform and influence the present. The precedent for the post-Ferguson United is provided by Liverpool of the early 1990s and there are plenty of parallels with the modern-day United.

A final title had been secured under a previous manager because rivals presented too little of a challenge and while several of the squad were over the hill, a prolific player with a lustrous left foot compensated: for John Barnes, read Robin van Persie.

However, whereas David Moyes arrived at Old Trafford and largely preserved the status quo on the playing staff, Graeme Souness proved a one-man wrecking ball at Anfield.

His attempts to implement change were ham-fisted -- arguably he both bought and sold the wrong players -- but the principle undermining his approach may have been correct.

Which brings us to another charismatic, outspoken character who tends to exert a revolutionary impact. Perhaps Jose Mourinho’s most intriguing January signing was French defender Kurt Zouma, who was promptly loaned back to Saint-Etienne for the rest of the season. He should arrive at Stamford Bridge in the summer. Or, to put it another way, when John Terry’s contract expires.

Ashley Cole and Frank Lampard’s deals also end then and, while Nemanja Matic represents a very different type of midfielder, he offers a glimpse of a way Chelsea could play without their record goalscorer. As they also own Thibaut Courtois, who has been parked at Atletico Madrid for the past three seasons, perhaps Petr Cech’s days are numbered, too.

Maybe Mourinho, having built Chelsea's greatest team, will definitively consign it to the past. Certainly he has the boldness and decisiveness required to make such a switch.

The criticism of him is that, in his quest for short-term success, he is overly fond of change. It may be a reason why Moyes was the continuity candidate United favoured to follow Ferguson. But, as they are discovering, sometimes stability can lead to stasis. 

Evil genius ‘Keyser Jose’ Mourinho proves he is the king of mind games

As long-time readers will probably be aware, I am not a huge personal admirer of Jose Mourinho.
However, there is no denying the sheer brilliance of his approach to Chelsea’s 1-0 victory at free-scoring Manchester City at the Etihad, where the hosts usually average around four goals a game.
A lot has been made of Manuel Pellegrini’s decision to deploy Martin Demichelis alongside Yaya Toure in central midfield, and it was indeed a big mistake – but in sport, mistakes only really register if someone is around to punish them, and that’s exactly what Mourinho did.
His lung-bursting midfield selection was a contrast from the attacking onslaught that had dominated West Ham, but failed to put away a winning goal. This time, he set up the likes of Willian, Ramires, Matic, Luiz and even Mikel to run and run and run - and they ran City ragged.
They not only left Demichelis chasing shadows, but were able to expose the deficiencies of the normally world-class Yaya Toure, isolate wingers Jesus Navas and David Silva in a Chelsea-swamped midfield and leave strikers Edin Dzeko and Alvaro Negredo at the mercy of an in-form back line.
But as good as the 90-minute performance was, the true evil genius of Mourinho’s approach to such a crucial game in the Premier League title race was how, like in the legendary movie The Usual Suspects, he had convinced fans and media alike that this particular devil did not exist.
In this instance, the devil was in the detail of his plot to do what nobody else could do and completely neutralise City’s hot shots on their own turf.
Mourinho continues to hold the upper hand over Pellegrini (AFP)
While dropping two points to their London rivals last week was by no means part of Mourinho’s plan, it’s fair to speculate that his mind was on the City clash prior to that game and perhaps even a couple of matches before that.
And when he trudged into the press conference and fumed about the Hammers’ ‘19th century football’, he not only contradicted a host of games in charge of various clubs where he had employed the same strategy, but appeared to be mentally frazzled by a chortling Sam Allardyce.
As it turns out, perhaps his post-match rants were sacrificing a pawn in order to take the queen.
Journalists from The Sun (badly) predict the Man City-Chelsea outcome
Did Pellegrini feel as though he was safe to opt for Demichelis and such a flat approach compared to previous matches, so long as his big-money pair up top broke the deadlock and with it, Jose’s spirit?
Maybe. Only Manuel can confirm this, but it’s the chief theory as to how he, his side and almost the entire footballing world were conned into thinking Chelsea would show them and their goalscoring feats respect on Monday night.
I use the phrase ‘show them respect’ as a deliberate alternative to ‘parking the bus’, because quite frankly I despise that term. To defend robustly is not ‘parking the bus’, it’s a completely fair tactic in football which pretty much pays the opposing side the ultimate compliment – that you fear the likelihood of being put to the sword if you try to engage in an open game.
The fact Mourinho was able to find a way of doing just that, however, in an effective and entertaining manner having convinced almost everyone otherwise before the game, shows that with Sir Alex Ferguson now retired, ‘The Special One’ is now the one true king of the ‘mind games’ jungle.
While I fancy City to learn from their naivety and grow even stronger at home after suffering that rare breach, it looks as though Mourinho is already preparing his next masterplan.
After seeing off one of his closest title rivals on the road, Mourinho continued to baffle in post-match pressers by claiming that his side are merely ‘a little horse learning to jump’ in their ‘three-horse race’ with two thoroughbred title rivals.
Experience certainly played a factor in the Monday game, but it was all Chelsea’s. Such a claim was as ridiculous as his bemoaning of defensive tactics, but don’t be fooled.
He will have had the return to the Etihad on February 15 in the FA Cup fifth round on his mind – not to mention the big March arrival of current league leaders Arsenal to Stamford Bridge – when he began his latest cunning verbal ploy with the ‘little horse’ comments.
While I’m not yet convinced Chelsea will definitely win this exciting race to the top of the Premier League mountain, someone is certainly going to have to address ‘Keyser Jose’ and his riddles if they are going to stop him guiding the Blues to the title in his first season in charge for a second time.

Paper Round: PSG plot £40m Januzaj swoop

Paris Saint-Germain want to lure Adnan Januzaj away from Manchester United with a staggering offer; Glenn Hoddle is in the frame for the Swansea job; and Arsene Wenger is set to spend heavily in the summer - here are the main stories making headlines in this morning's newspapers.

Januzaj on PSG radar: Paris Saint-Germain are plotting a sensational £40 million bid for Manchester United winger Adnan Januzaj, according to the Daily Star. The mega-rich French champions had a £15m offer for the teenager rejected last month but are ready to resurrect their interest with a massive offer in the summer. The paper claims that PSG boss Laurent Blanc "remains convinced he can lure the winger to Paris" by taking advantage of United's demise this season - and offering the youngster an eye-watering £100,000 a week.
Paper Round's view: As the report acknowledges, this 'news' will come as a headache for United, who have high hopes for Januzaj, but must also surely understand that their ability to retain top players and pulling power in the transfer market will be seriously compromised if they do not reach next season's Champions League.Juan Mata might not have been bothered, but his situation was completely different to Januzaj's, while it remains to be seen whether Wayne Rooney will stay or not. How the remainder of the Premier League season pans out could be crucial to who David Moyes will have at his disposal come next season. The good news for United fans? The story appears only in the Daily Star and not in any other, more reputable, papers.
- - -
Hoddle on Swansea shortlist: Former England manager Glenn Hoddle is on Swansea's list of potential replacements for Michael Laudrup, according to the back page of today's Daily Mirror. And Hoddle is interested in the job, the paper reports, having been sounded out about the post three months ago. Back then, the Mirror "understands" that Hoddle was reluctant to get involved while another man was still in charge but it is known he wants to get back into top-flight management and is a "genuine contender".
Paper Round's view: Hoddle's CV lists some top jobs - ChelseaSouthampton and Tottenham, along with England - but he has not worked in management since he left Wolves in 2006 and not in the Premier League since September 2003. As such, his potential arrival at the Liberty Stadium can only be classed in the 'risky' category. That said, given his experience, some would argue that he is a better bet than Garry Monk or Graeme Jones, neither of whom have previous top-flight knowledge of a manager's job.
- - -
Arsenal target three top players: Arsene Wenger plans to spend heavily on three world class players - a new right-back, centre-midfielder and striker - this summer, reports the Daily Mail. The Gunners still have a substantial transfer budget, despite the £42 million summer signing of Mesut Ozil and the board will back Wenger in his search for a trio who he feels will make a difference next season. The club will return for Julian Draxler, the paper claims, while Jackson Martinez, Edin Dzeko, Mario Mandzukic, Diego Costa and Lukasz Piszczek are also mentioned.
Paper Round's view: There was a time when the mere thought of Arsenal splashing the cash on these kind of players would have prompted nothing but disbelieving guffaws, but the Gunners are a different beast these days and should very much be taken seriously when it comes to dealing in the transfer market. Their move for Ozil heralded a brave new era in north London and with the board willing to back Wenger to make further additions, it's something of a scary prospect for other Premier League clubs. All Wenger has to do now is loosen up a little bit and not be frightened of getting the cheque book out, even though his reluctance to overpay for Draxler last month was admirable.
- - -
West Ham set for High Court: West Ham are ready to go all the way to the High Court to appealAndy Carroll's controversial sending off, with the Daily Mirror claiming such a move will throw the FA's disciplinary system into disarray. The Hammers have enlisted a top QC to further their case, which is based on the FA's claim that there has to be an “obvious error” for the dismissal to be overturned. The club, however, maintain they cannot see such wording in the rules and have asked the FA to clarify where this is stated.
Paper Round's view: West Ham are desperate, that much is clear. Such is their need for Carroll in crucial relegation battles against Aston Villa on Saturday and Norwich next Tuesday, they are willing to test the FA's rules. They may well be fighting a losing battle though, since the report claims the wording in question is included in policy documents that "all clubs have received, are aware of and have signed up to".
- - -
Ferdinand accused of stirring potRio Ferdinand has risked the wrath of David Moyes after asking on Twitter who his followers thought will be the next managerial casualty. The Daily Mail reports that the defender, said to not exactly see eye-to-eye with Moyes, has been accused of whipping up talk about his manager's future with the enigmatic poser.
Paper Round's view: Ferdinand shrugged off the controversy, claiming his tweet was misinterpreted, but it doesn't take a genius to work out that Moyes' name would come up as a possible answer, given his disastrous start to the post-Alex Ferguson era. At best it was cheeky from Ferdinand, at worst rabble-rousing, but either way Moyes is unlikely to be over the moon with his player's behaviour.